:format(webp))
Short answer: A shrinking construction market does not reduce revenue proportionally across manufacturers — it redistributes it. When there are fewer projects, the teams that reach them while the specification is still open capture a larger share of what remains. Four things separate the growing group: they see projects at planning stage, they know which projects fit their portfolio, they monitor existing customers for new activity, and they have removed the manual work that consumes capacity precisely when capacity matters most.
Does a shrinking construction market affect all manufacturers equally?
No, and the mechanism is worth understanding. When project volume falls, the number of suppliers chasing each remaining project rises. Effort stops being a differentiator because everyone is working hard.
What differentiates is who arrives while the requirements are still being written. A manufacturer present at design stage is competing on technical fit. One arriving at tender is competing on price against products already declared equivalent — and in a tight market, that price competition is harsher.
So the gap between the leading group and everyone else widens during a downturn rather than narrowing.
What do the growing manufacturers see that others do not?
Projects at planning stage. Not at tender — at planning.
That difference is a data problem rather than a strategy problem. Tender portals are structurally too late for specification-driven products. Early signals sit in planning applications, building permits, design competition results, developer and investor announcements, architectural and trade press, local news and construction signage.
The obstacle is volume and fragmentation: thousands of authorities, different formats, the same project appearing four times under different names. Building Radar consolidates these across more than 50 countries and detects projects at planning and design stage, which is the capability the growing group has and the others do not.
How do growing manufacturers decide which projects to pursue?
Against their own portfolio rather than against a project category.
Filtering for "commercial buildings over €10 million" returns hundreds of projects, most of which do not need a specific product. Real relevance requires the system to know what you sell — Jeane, the intelligence inside Building Radar, reads your website, product catalogues and technical data sheets, which is why two manufacturers looking at the same school project correctly receive different scores.
In a tight market this matters more, not less. With fewer projects available, pursuing the wrong ones is more expensive because there is less margin for wasted capacity.
Why does monitoring existing customers matter in a weak market?
Because existing customers start new projects without mentioning them.
A developer or contractor you already supply files a permit in a region your account owner does not cover. Whether that surfaces depends on whether someone happens to notice. In a growing market, missing it costs one project. In a shrinking market, where new logos are harder to win, it costs one of the few opportunities that were genuinely accessible.
Systematic monitoring of key accounts for new project activity is unglamorous and disproportionately valuable when the market is thin.
Why does removing manual work matter most in a downturn?
Because a weaker market increases the manual load per opportunity. Reps search longer to find a viable project, review more tenders to find a winnable one, and spend more time qualifying because a higher share of what they see is not worth pursuing.
So exactly when capacity matters most, the manual burden rises. Teams still running on manual research end up with less selling time in a downturn than in a boom.
Around 3.5 hours per rep per day goes to project search, tender review, contact research, prioritisation and CRM updates. Teams that removed it report roughly 80% less manual project sales work, and the freed capacity goes into specifier contact rather than into finding the next thing to look at.
What does the external evidence say about where the opportunity is?
Worth citing something not produced by a software vendor.
Roland Berger's Construction Radar 2026 assessed seven profitability levers across the construction industry. For building products companies, commercial excellence ranked among the highest-potential levers — ahead of portfolio adaptation, procurement excellence and financial restructuring.
That runs against the instinct in construction, where cost-cutting feels like the safe move when volume falls. The data points elsewhere: one of the largest available opportunities is in how you sell.
Roland Berger has no software to sell. They looked at the industry and identified commercial excellence as one of the clearest paths to profitability in the current market.
What should a manufacturer do now if the market is weak?
Four steps, in order:
Establish coverage. Count relevant projects in your target markets, and compare against what your team was aware of last year. Most find the delta uncomfortable, and it is the number that reframes the conversation.
Move project entry earlier. Audit average project stage at first contact across the last twenty deals. If it clusters at tender, that is the largest available improvement.
Remove the manual load. Capacity freed now goes into projects entering planning today, which produce revenue when the market turns.
Instrument it. Average project stage at first contact, specification rate, win rate from project found to closed. Without these, the improvement is invisible and the activity gets cut in the next budget review.
Companies such as Schindler, Heidelberg Materials, Hochtief and Saint-Gobain Switzerland already use Building Radar to their advantage.
Frequently asked questions
Why do some construction suppliers grow in a shrinking market? Because a smaller number of projects is redistributed rather than shared proportionally. Teams reaching projects while the specification is still open capture a larger share of what remains.
Is a downturn a good time to invest in construction sales infrastructure? Arguably the best time, because sales cycles run 18 to 36 months and the capacity to change how a team works exists when volume is lower.
What is commercial excellence in construction? Improving how a company sells — pricing, sales process, market coverage. Roland Berger's Construction Radar 2026 assessed it as one of the highest-potential profitability levers for building products companies.
Where should a manufacturer start when the market is weak? With market coverage — how many relevant projects exist versus how many the team saw. Everything downstream has a ceiling set by that number.
Ready to gain share while the market is tight?
Find out how Building Radar's revenue engineering solution puts your team on the projects entering planning now.
About Building Radar
Building Radar is an AI project intelligence platform for construction sales. It discovers construction projects in more than 50 countries — including at planning and design stage, before any tender is published — scores each project against a company's specific product portfolio, identifies the decision-makers, and drives the resulting sales work through Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics or SAP C4C. Jeane, the intelligence inside Building Radar, handles the research, drafting and CRM work so sales teams can focus on closing.
Schedule an initial consultation